Abstract: Read chronological decades, rational age, and you may degree level in terms of this new frequency off real and you can conceptual religious considering

Abstract: Read chronological decades, rational age, and you may degree level in terms of this new frequency off real and you can conceptual religious considering

Abstract: Read chronological decades, rational age, and you may degree level in terms of this new frequency off real and you can conceptual religious considering

Peatling, John H. 1974. “Cognitive Development in People from inside the Levels Five thanks to 12: The newest Chance from Real and you https://datingranking.net/es/los-mejores-sitios-de-citas/ may Spiritual Considering.” Character Prospective: Monitoring of Research vol. seven, pp. 52-61. step 1,994 children out-of a beneficial eight% random decide to try of the National Relationship out-of Episcopal Universities, grades cuatro-12, were administered an enthusiastic untimed, criterion-referenced several-options sample titled “Taking into consideration the Bible.” Show basically hold the conclusions out of J. Piaget and you can R. Goldman. The brand new statistical steps functioning exhibited episodes out-of progress and plateaus (otherwise intermediate attacks). Contained in this Western shot, conceptual spiritual considering seemed to begin in Grades 8 and you can nine, maybe not are dominant up until Grades 10-several on account of good plateau several months. Results for most of the 3 facts was tall, however, degree top offered new clearest indications out-of change. Ramifications to have religious instructors as well as for requisite further browse is talked about. [Source: PI]

Strommen, Merton P. 1971. Look on the Religious Innovation: An extensive Handbook: A project of the Spiritual Education Connection. Ny, New york : Hawthorn.

Abstract: There are 5 emotional properties out of trust loosely linked to 5 periods out of teenage creativity: experience of like and you will de–centration, knowledge of ethical blame, allowed off puzzle and you can growth of “a symbol feel,” sense of expectancy, lastly, joyful promise and safety

1969. “Shame within the Moral Innovation: A comparative Studies.” Mental Reports pp. 739-745. Abstract: 400 17-20 year. dated undergraduates participated in an investigation to find out: (a) men and women parts hence people thought essential in its ethical considerations; (b) brand new the amount that such as children usually feel accountable when it comes to to take part in factors throughout these elements; and you can (c) one variations in relevant categories to have students reared or not reared into the relatively tight Religious backgrounds. Show suggest thirteen parts and that is important to the brand new youngsters when you look at the ethical factors, differences in guilt feelings, and you may differences in answers relative to backgrounds. [Source: PI]

Peretti, Peter O

Hugen, Melvin D. 1968. “This new Church Role in Maturity.”Process of your Christian Relationship getting Emotional Knowledge pp. 59-67. Abstract: Utilising the stages away from progress by which anyone generally speaking entry on path in order to readiness as outlined by “That-Searching for Declaration of Midcentuary White Domestic Conference on the Children and you can Youthfulness,” ways that brand new chapel is give information for for example growth try talked about. [Source: PI]

Eppel, E. Yards. and you may Meters. Eppel. 1967. Teenagers and you will Morality: A study of Certain Ethical Thinking and you will Difficulties at the office Adolescents in the context of a changing Environment out of Thoughts. New york: N.Y. Humanities Force. Abstract: Gifts “a diagnosis of the climate off viewpoint into the morality away from young adults due to the fact conveyed within the instructional, spiritual, and you will scientific reports in recent years, together with an evaluation of your impact off ‘the the fresh new morality.'” The initial part merchandise look produced by the foregoing investigation, “and you can works together brand new viewpoints and you can thinking out of magistrates, probation officials, and you can young people management to the morality regarding. (adolescents) as well as on differences between this new years.” It is concluded that the main focus regarding adolescents’ ethical matter seems to rest throughout the dilemma of the setting-up satisfactory matchmaking. [Source: PI] [Source: PI]

Amatora, ent Through the Adolescence.” Catholic Emotional Number vol. step one, pp. 1-9. Abstract: Education from attitudes and you will techniques of one’s teenage with the faith was off limited play with, unless of course new ensuing knowledge enforce to providing your deepen his spirituality. Inspiration getting life style their religion should be inherent. Faith will help satisfy the 8 very first means of youngsters. [Source: PI]

Van Dyke, Paul and John Penetrate Jones. 1963. “The fresh new Mindset out of Faith of Center and you will Later Puberty: A peek at Empirical Lookup, 1950-1960.” Spiritual Degree vol. 58, pp. 529-537. Abstract: Report about empirical search about growth of ethical thinking through the middle and you may later puberty, leaving out authoritarian identity, dogmatism, and you will prejudice. [Source: PI]

Godin, Andre. 1958. “Believe and Mental Growth of People and you will Teens.” Lumen Vitaevol. thirteen, pp. 297-311. Affective issues designed in the 1st many years of existence can be prevent this new plenitude off trust. Brand new character of one’s moms and dads and especially case of the father-figure are very important. The organization try traced due to very early childhood (2-8 years), later youngsters (8-several age), pre-adolescence (12-14 age), adolescence (14-16 decades), and puberty (16-18 age). [Source: PI]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are makes.